Archive for the ‘Space Station Architecture Competition’ Category

Nathan Huette and Casey Tucker

September 21, 2013

Board_01

Board_2

Potential proposal for space exploration with key thought of research units which can be housed on the exterior of the station’s body. Requires a high degree of further development. Perhaps researching the Curiosity Rover could be fed back into the proposal’s design.

Advertisement

Mostafa Seleem

September 21, 2013

Sheet1

Sheet2

Simple but effective concept with respect to circulation of a potential station design.  It requires a heavy amount of development and improved presentation graphics before it can become feasible.

Miguel A Flores

September 21, 2013

final board 1

final board 2

Energy efficient scheme that turns space waste into reusable energies. Interesting proposal and lucrative graphics, however, requires significant design development to lead to fruition.

Michelle Elbers and Katherine Wiley

September 21, 2013

Board_1

Board_2

Intriguing graphics and concept as a collective modular system or swarm. However, the proposal lacks substance and would require more than conceptual imagery.

Mateja Ličer

September 21, 2013

Comp_ISS_1

Comp_ISS_2

Habitat composition images are extremely effective, expressing the scheme as one of the most buildable and feasible. While the concept as an extension to the existing ISS is a simple but effective design. Perhaps requires an over all explanation and exploration of the units with respect to full time circulation and habitation.

Luga-OU

September 21, 2013

BIG BANG VILLA-ALL

Compelling approach to the effects of space on the human body and conceptual proposal to such understandings. Credit is due for tackling such overlooked and fundamental issues. Further development would be required with respect to detail or technical studies.

LiuJie

September 21, 2013

ZEUS POWER SPACE STATION_1

ZEUS POWER SPACE STATION_2

Impressive approach to the competition, where energy efficiency is maximized in effect like a portable battery, through embracing nature’s elements. General exploration of building design could be further developed with respect to habitation while we would question the design’s capabilities outside of the earth’s atmosphere. Regardless such a design could materialize before any outer space station comes into fruition.

Kristian & Vladas

September 21, 2013

BLOB STATION_Page_1

BLOB STATION_Page_2

We were delighted to see such conceptual thinking. The ideal that biology could outpace technology as a form of architecture and structure in the future. Exciting proposal, however, extremely conceptual and decades away from materializing.

Karolina Čiplytė & Andrius Laurinaitis

September 21, 2013

RA_humanIDarchive_Ciplyte_Laurinaitis_Page_1

RA_humanIDarchive_Ciplyte_Laurinaitis_Page_2

Very credible conceptual thinking, with the creation of a monument for space. Simplistic forms and suggested design are appealing, however again, requires fundamental development with respect to detail and technology. We would be enthusiastic to see how such a monument would be viewed from Earth, inhabited or controlled. A lot of questions remain to be explored.

Kareem Naser

September 21, 2013

Hollow Moon_Kareem Naser_Page_1

Hollow Moon_Kareem Naser_Page_2

Extremely strong concept and all round presentation. We admire the efficient use of existing moon environment and believe the general concept could adapt to most planetary contexts. The proposal’s buildability and technology has been developed to a significant level integrating a smart façade system and laser printing. We would perhaps question how circulation would occur between units.